In a recent development within the Ukrainian political landscape, David Arakhamia, a prominent figure and head of the parliamentary faction “Servant of the People,” has voiced his strong opposition to the proposal of allowing journalists access to the country’s Parliament. Arakhamia expressed discontent, particularly highlighting the use of large cameras by media representatives to capture private correspondences of Members of Parliament (MPs).
Arakhamia’s primary argument revolves around the safety of the media personnel themselves. Speaking on the “Topics with Natalia Mosiychuk” program, he pointed out the ever-present risk of intelligence operations that might view the Parliament and the government quarter as potential targets. Arakhamia contends that the notion seems absurd, especially when journalists argue that it’s a mere excuse. He emphasized the establishment of a dedicated press center, where deputies are willing to provide all necessary comments.
The Chief of the Parliament’s Apparatus also joined the opposition against allowing journalists into the parliamentary sessions, citing concerns about the threat of shelling and expressing worry that journalists might choose their spots, disrupting the overall proceedings.
Arakhamia supported this stance and complained about the methods employed by journalists who photograph private correspondences of MPs. He decried the situation where reporters with bulky cameras enter and simply sit, scrutinizing phone screens.
“We’ve taken this to the absurd! When they come in with such devices and just sit, staring at you. You spend 8 hours at this job. And there’s no ventilation in that hall. The atmosphere there is terrible,” he lamented.
Arakhamia’s articulated concerns highlight his focus on the safety and comfort of the Parliament, providing clarity on his position for the public.